Biology’s Parallel to Dark Matter

Entangled among the galaxies in this Hubble image are 
mysterious-looking arcs of blue light. These are actually
distorted images of remote galaxies behind the cluster.
The collective gravity of all the normal and dark matter 
trapped inside the cluster warps space-time and affects
light traveling through the cluster toward Earth.
NASA, ESA, and J. Lotz and the HFF Team (STScI)

In "The Imagined Conflict", chapter 6 "Evolution and Purpose", ends like this:

Newton’s law of gravitation was a breakthrough because it united the large and small. It could describe everything from how stones fell on Earth, to the stability of planetary orbits. The world seemed to work like a clock, just like the early mechanical clocks. The prime example is the one from 1386 in the cathedral in Salisbury, England, which is the world’s oldest functioning clock. This mechanistic view of nature took over from the more organic view that the Medieval Age had from Aristotle. It played a crucial role during the Enlightenment of the eighteenth century, when Laplace also came up with a description of how a planetary system could form. In principle, everything could now be calculated, if the initial conditions were known. It was believed that these laws not only described nature but also explained why nature works. They had forgotten the insight of Newton, Boyle, Kepler, and Galileo that the laws were just describing how, not the why of the universe.

Inspiration from Christian Scientists over the Last Centuries and the Myth of Galileo's Proof (YouTube)

Without knowing it, during a typical day, we all encounter many of the most important natural scientists from history. Surprisingly, the Christian faith meant something personal to many of them, as illustrated by their own words in this talk. 

Among them is Galileo about whose personal faith we don’t know much. But a persistent myth is that he had proven that the Earth revolves around the sun. Galileo himself knew very well that he had not. Scientifically Tycho Brahe's geoheliocentric model was held to be the correct one long after Galileo had passed away. It is therefore impossible to comprehend the Galileo affair without understanding Brahe's model.

The Myth of Galileo's Proof and the Inspiration from Christian Scientists over the Last Centuries

The 3 best science-based arguments for faith in God

Do you want to hear what I consider to be the 3 best science-based arguments for faith in God? Then watch my Cambridge lecture from last week, at the The Faraday Institute for Science and Religion. 

It's all based on the book "The imagined conflict".

Press the image for link to YouTube.

The Genesis view in Haydn’s oratorio "The Creation"

Image from Naxos

The Appendix of The Imagined Conflict lists five main positions for reconciling science and the Bible. In order to understand them, it is important to grasp the historic context of their origins. One of the ambitions of the The Imagined Conflict has been to provide that context for these views:

1. Young Earth creationism (YEC): Solar day theory
2. Old Earth creationism (OEC)
• Chaos-restitution interpretation 
• Gap theory
3. Progressive creationism: Day-age interpretation
4. Guided evolution
5. Planned evolution

There are in fact two more also listed: Deistic evolution and Atheistic evolution, but these views are not really about reconciliation as they ignore the Bible as a source of knowledge.

Sometimes these five views are presented as a menu to choose from, but they have been developed in a dialogue with the development of science. They are best understood in a history of science context. 

A scientist evaluates the Galileo affair

Page 86 from "The Imagined Conflict"

A persistent myth is that Galileo's observations (see image) were proof that the Earth revolves around the sun. Galileo himself knew very well that he did not have a very good case scientifically for this hypothesis. He tried to advance an erroneous argument based on the tides, but his "Tidal proof" convinced few at the time and is actually incorrect.

In chapter 3 of “The Imagined Conflict” (Wipf & Stock, 2025), a major part is entitled “Galileo was right and so were his critics”* (pp. 85–102). My claim is that this chapter has one of the most accessible and comprehensive accounts available about the science at the time of Galileo. Unique for the book in this genre is also that it has 41 figures and illustrations, 11 of which are in chapter 3.

Table of contents

Here is a detailed table of contents. It complements the table of contents on page vii of the book which only lists the chapter headings.

Introduction                                                         1
    God has arranged all things

    The big questions

1 God's two books                                              12
    Does science make religion unnecessary?
    A faith to be proud of
    Too much to doubt and too little to believe
    Seven different perspectives

2 The amazing creation                                     31               Consciousness and language
    The finely tuned water molecule
    Created from stardust
    Cosmic evolution and intelligent life
    A creation that points to a creator

Differences from Norwegian original

The main difference between this English version and the Norwegian original from 2021 is that the appendix consists of material which was previously at the end of chapters 3, 4, 6, and 7. 

The section titled “The Complex Complexity Argument” in chapter 6 has been completely rewritten and shortened. The section on “What Is Science?” at the end of chapter 5, the section “The Inexplicability of Evolutionary Transitions” in chapter 6, and “The Mystery of Language Evolution” in chapter 7 are all new, as is chapter 8, "The Perceived and the Real Conflict", which has been completely rewritten. 

There are, in addition, minor differences from the original in most chapters including some 9 new references to literature from 2021–2024.